For example I just watched
Dark Skies for the first time. The name conjures up imagery of UFOs
blacking out the sky, dark thunder storms, and/or and all out war
from above. While the movie did involve aliens, and tons of
conspiracies related to aliens, abductions, and UFOs, there was not a
single UFO in the film. There wasn't even a single shot of the sky
really. It also wasn't dark, being fairly well lit for like, 95% of the
film.
Overall it wasn't a bad
movie, not great, kind of a mish-mash of things that had been done,
but well paced and just mysterious enough to keep the viewer’s
interest. However, I also feel like it probably would have gotten
another half a star if it had a more accurately named.
Another example of this is
Silent Predators, a movie in which the main threat is anything but
silent. The main threat, while a predator, is also to small to
predate human. It, or rather they, are several aggressive hybrid rattlesnakes, that
were, until recently hibernating. The main plot being that you hear
the snake rattle, then it bites you, and you die.
Come on guys. Many classic
horror movies were named by friends of the director who'd get drunk
and watch the film from dusk to dawn, when hung-over they'd called
the director and mumbled a name into the phone. Still, it was more
accurate then the examples above.
Which isn't to say that
there aren't some well named horror movies recently, Sharknado comes
to mind. Very descriptive of the small part of the movie I saw,
sharks flying through the air, riding a vortex!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are reviewed for content (to prevent spam and filter out intentionally inflammatory remarks), and therefore will not appear right away. Thank you for understanding.